-
-
-
-
-
- About extra-mural studies (EMS)
- EMS requirements
- Information for vet students
- Information for EMS providers
- Information for vet schools
- Temporary EMS requirements
- Practice by students - regulations
- Health and safety on EMS placements
- EMS contacts and further guidance
- Extra-mural studies fit for the future
-
-
- Code of Professional Conduct for Veterinary Surgeons
- Code of Professional Conduct for Veterinary Nurses
- Contact the Advice Team
- XL Bully dog ban
- 'Under care' - new guidance
- Advice on Schedule 3
- Controlled Drugs Guidance – A to Z
- Dealing with Difficult Situations webinar recordings
- FAQs – Common medicines pitfalls
- FAQs – Routine veterinary practice and clinical veterinary research
- FAQs – Advertising of practice names
- GDPR – RCVS information and Q&As
New RCVS/BVA report supports ethical review of practice-based research
20 February 2013
A Working Party led by the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons (RCVS) and the British Veterinary Association (BVA) has published guidance on ethical review for veterinary surgeons carrying out practice-based research.
The Working Party comprised representatives and experts from a range of veterinary organisations and research establishments (see end of story) and was chaired by Professor the Lord Sandy Trees.
The Working Party’s report aims to assist veterinary surgeons who are carrying out practice-based research but who may not have access to the ethical review structure of a university or institute.
It explains the difference between clinical practice and clinical research, then focuses on clinical research that does not require Home Office authorisation under the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 (ASPA) (which authorisation includes mandatory ethical review).
The Working Party believes that “ethical review for all such [non-ASPA] research is advised”.
Practice-based research is to be encouraged, and is becoming increasingly common and sophisticated
The report recommends that would-be researchers develop relationships with veterinary institutes so as to be able to submit research proposals to their ethical review committees.
It also recommends that the RCVS considers establishing its own ethical review committee, and that the RCVS Recognised Veterinary Practice Committee be enlarged and better promoted to the profession.
“Practice-based research is to be encouraged, and is becoming increasingly common and sophisticated,” says Lord Trees, pictured, who is an RCVS Past-President and Council member.
“However, it’s not easy for those in practice to access ethical review support. We hope this report will enable practice-based research to be conducted to the best standards and to protect animals, the public and practitioners themselves.”
Peter Jones, President of the British Veterinary Association, says: "Many practitioners are involved in clinically-based research and we welcome the guidance given in this joint RCVS/BVA report, which can inform our members of the regulations and best practice required and will enable them to attain high standards in the conduct of such research."
The Ethical Review for Practice-Based Research Working Party included representatives from:
- The British Cattle Veterinary Association
- The British Equine Veterinary Association
- The British Small Animal Veterinary Association
- The British Veterinary Association
- The Home Office
- The Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons
- The University of Cambridge
- The Veterinary Defence Society